Experiencing the space with a phenomenological approach: A method proposal for relating the senses with representation and design
Keywords:Design Education, Experiential Learning, Phenomenological Approach, Representation, Sensual Perception
Today, in design education, designers can focus on image production rather than the experience of the space and the tactile qualities of the materials used. The study which was held with reference to this situation aims to develop holistic perception skills; to discuss the interactive roles of the senses in perception and representation; to raise awareness about the concepts of place, volume, space; and to use this awareness in design. Within the scope of the workshop conducted with the undergraduate students of Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Department of Interior Design, the participants were asked to do sensory reading exercises in the places they chose and then to represent their sensations and to use this data in the design of a city furniture. After the design process a survey was conducted to get feedback from the students. The results confirm that vision is the primary sense in perception; the fact that students focus on different senses in the space did not change this situation. In the stage of representation, the form and movement elements in the spaces were the most effective. The significant relationship between reflection and design phases showed that representation studies have positive effects on design processes and that such practices can be included more frequently in education programs.
Armağan, C. (2011). Phenomenological method and tectonic language: Design with material [Master’s thesis, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi].
Arnheim, R. (2015). Görsel düşünme. Metis Yayıncılık.
Atakan, G. (2014). Cognitive approach and metacognitive awareness in creative design process [Master's thesis, Hacettepe University].
Aydınlı, S. (2015). Tasarım eğitiminde yapılandırıcı paradigma: ‘Öğrenmeyi öğrenme’. Tasarım + Kuram, 11(20), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.23835/tasarimkuram.239579
Aydınlı, S., Eren, Ç., Erkök, F., Uz-Sönmez, F. (2005). Tasarım eğitiminin ilk yılı: Stüdyo. Tasarım Kuram Eleştiri Dergisi, (2) Güz, 9-12.
Ayna, A. & Domaniçli, F. (2018, October 20-21). Duyusal hacim. Mimari tasarım eğitimi: Bütünleşme. II. Ulusal Sempozyumu, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Ayna, A. (2011). Mekânın duyusal-algısal boyutlarının beden-mekân ilişkisi üzerinden irdelenmesi: Pantomim-mimarlık sanat dalları arakesitinden bakış [Yüksek lisans tezi, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi].
Baaki, J., & Luo, T. (2017). Stimulating students’ use of external representations for a distance education time machine design. TechTrends, 61(4), 355–365. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11528-016-0155-z
Bachelard, G. (1969). The poetics of space. Beacon Press.
Broderick, P. C. (1998). Early Adolescent Gender Differences in the Use of Ruminative and Distracting Coping Strategies. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431698018002003
Brown, R. & Farrelly, L. (2012). Materials and interior design. Laurence King Publishing.
Clemons, S. A. (2006). Interior design supports art education: A case study. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 25(3), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2006.00494.x
Degen, M. M., Rose, G. (2012). The sensory experiencing of urban design: The role of walking and perceptual memory. Geography, Urban Studies & Planning, 49(15), 3271-3287.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. D.C. Heath and Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/10903-000
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan Company.
Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. Touchstone Books - Simon & Schuster.
Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience. Perigee.
Eastman, C. M. (2001). New directions in design cognition: Studies of representation and recall. In C. Eastman, W. Newstetter, M. McCracken (Eds.) Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education (p. 147-198). Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043868-9/50008-5
Giampa, J. M. (2012). Sinking maps: A conceptual tool for visual metaphor [Doctor of arts thesis, George Mason University, Fairfax, USA].
Goncalves, M., Cardoso, C., & Badke-schaub, P. (2014). What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation. Design Studies, 35(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.09.001
Hardin, M. (1994). Design fundamentals I: An iterative loop, beginnings in architectural education. Proceedings of Acsa/Eaae Conference Prague 1993, Acsa Press.
Hegarty, J. (2014). There are no rules. Thames and Hudson Ltd.
Holl, S. (2000). Parallax. Princeton Architectural Press.
Huybrechts, L., Schoffelen, J., Schepers, S., & Braspenning, L. (2012). Design representations: Connecting, making and reflecting in design research education. In D. Boutsen (Ed.), Good practices best practices: Highlighting the compound idea of education, creativity, research, and practice (p. 35-42). Luca Press.
Ittelson, W., H. (1973). Environment perception and contemporary perceptual theory. In W. H. Ittelson (Ed.) Environment and cognition (p. 1-19). Seminar.
Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F
Kartal, A. N. (2020). It is Time to Consider Sensory Urban Experiences: Looking into Today’s Istiklal Street, Istanbul Through the Thresholds of Auditory Experiences. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 20(2), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.22452/jdbe.vol20no2.4
Keeton, M. (1978). Learning by experience: What, why, how. Jossey-Bass.
Keskeys, P. (2005). How Steven Holl uses watercolor paintings to create amazing architecture. Architizer. https://architizer.com/blog/practice/tools/how-architecture-is-born-steven-holl-2/ (18.03.2022).
Knowles, M. (1978). The adult learner: A neglected species (2nd Edition). Gulf Publishing.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
Kuk, H. S., Holst, J. D. (2018). A dissection of experiential learning theory: Alternative approaches to reflection. Adult Learning, 29(4), 150-157.
Lang, J. (1987). Creating the architectural theory. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Leski, K. (2017). Yaratıcılık fırtınası. MediaCat Kitapları.
Lewis, M., Staehler, T. (2020). Fenomenoloji. (M. Demirhan, M. Özkurt Gürsoy, O. B. Kaplan, M. Türkan, N. Şahankaya, Trans.) Folkitap.
Linsey, J. S., Wood, K. L., & Markman, A. B. (2008). Modality and representation in analogy. Artificial Intelligence For Engineering Design, Analysis And Manufacturing: AIEDAM, 22(2), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060408000061
Medway, P. (1994). The language component in technological capability: Lessons from architecture. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4(1), 85-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197585
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception (D. A. Landes, Trans.). Routledge.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1971). Existence, space and architecure. Praeger.
Onur, D. & Zorlu, T. (2018). Tasarım eğitiminde yaratıcılık olgusu: Çok duyulu farkındalık atölyeleri. Gece Kitaplığı.
Özçam, I. (2022). Designer identity: Reflection with verbal and visual representation systems. Online Journal of Art and Design, 10(1), 76-93.
Pallasmaa, J. (2009). The thinking hand: Existential and embodied wisdom in architecture. John Wiley & Sons.
Pallasmaa, J. (2019). Tenin gözleri: Mimarlık ve duyular (A. U. Kılıç, Trans.). YEM Yayınevi.
Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271225
Rapoport, A. (1987) Pedestrian street use: culture and perception. In A. V. Moudon (Ed.), Public streets for public use (p. 80-94). Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Schön, D. (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potential. RIBA Publications.
Schön, D. (1992). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.
Seylan, A. (2020). Temel tasarım. YEM Yayın.
Soesman, A. (1998). Our twelve senses: Wellsprings of the soul. Hawthorn Press.
Soygeniş, S. (2006) Mimarlık düşünmek düşlemek. YEM Yayın.
Till, J. (1996). Architecture in space, time. In C. Melhuish (Ed.), Architecture and anthropology (p. 12-16). London Academy Editions.
Unwin, S. (2009). Analysing architecture. Routledge.
Yorgancıoğlu & Seyman Güray. (2018). Alternative approaches in architectural design education, MEGARON Yıldız Technical University Faculty of Architecture E-Journal 13(1), 144-155. https://doi.org/10.5505/megaron.2017.74946
Copyright (c) 2022 IDA: International Design and Art Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IDA: International Design and Art Journal is an open-access academic journal. All publishing rights of the accepted articles are deemed to assign to IDA: International Design and Art Journal. Articles can not be published and copied anywhere, and can not be used without reference.
IDA: International Design and Art Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.