Investigating students’ challenges in learning architectural design process
Keywords:Reflective thinking, Learning style, Design process, Design product, Architecture student
Architectural design education is one of the curricula taught at different levels and requires identifying factors that influence students’ design process. Meanwhile, learning styles and reflective thinking are two variables influencing the design process. Matching teachers’ teaching styles with students’ learning and thinking styles strengthens the design product. The present study aims to investigate the relationship between reflective thinking and learning styles with the design ability of architecture students. The method used is descriptive-analytical and descriptive-correlative. Accordingly, the preference of 140 architecture students from Tehran Azad University and Konya Technical University for Kolb’s learning styles was investigated. In this respect, Kember and Leung’s reflective thinking questionnaire was used for the four components of habitual action, understanding, reflection, and critical reflection, and Kolb’s learning style questionnaire was used for the four components of divergent, convergent, assimilative, and accommodative learning styles. The results showed that there was a direct relationship between reflective thinking and students’ design ability. In other words, with reflective thinking and intellectual ability, appropriate prediction for architectural design can be achieved. In addition, design ability is related to the student’s learning style.
Aljojo, N. (2017). Differences in styles of thinking ‘In light of Sternberg’s theory’: A case study of different educational levels in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 7(3), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.291
Babich, B. (2016). On Heidegger on education and questioning. In Peters, M. (Eds). Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_151-1
Bastani, M., Mahmoodi, A. S. M. (2019). Learning styles and analogical thinking method during the design process of architecture. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 24(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2019.261784.672064
Clara, M. (2015). What is reflection? Looking for clarity in an ambiguous notion. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114552028
De Bono, E. (2020). How to have a beautiful mind: (Vermilion life essentials). Vermilion.
DeWitt, D., Alias, N., Siraj, S. (2016). Problem solving strategies of Malaysian secondary school teachers. Educational Technology to Improve Quality and Access of Education to Prosperous Society, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Bali, 1-14.
Díaz, M. J. F., Santaolalla, R. C., González, A. G. (2010). Faculty attitudes and training needs to respond the new European Higher Education challenges. Higher Education, 60(1), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9282-1
Faizi, M. & Dezhpasand, S. (2019). Analysis of learning styles to improve architectural education (Case study: Architecture students of Urmia University). JIAS Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, 7(14), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.22052/1.14.149
Farzian, M., Karbasi, A. (2014). Handcrafts - personal experience learning by doing in architectural design education. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 19(3), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2014.55411
Hosseini, E. S., Falamaki, M. M., Hojat, I. (2021). Explaining pattern of individual-centered design process and Architectural design training model based on learners’ cognitive differences. Hoviatshahr, 15(3), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.30495/hoviatshahr.2021.16357
Kamarudin, M. Y., Mohd, N., Nik, R., Ahmad, H. Y., Abdul Ghani, K. (2016). Inculcation of higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in Arabic language teaching at Malaysian primary schools. Creative Education (Scientific Research Publishing), 7(2), 307-314. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.72030
Karvan, F. (2021). Design process: From idea to presentation, based on reflective thought and learning styles in architecture students, Soffeh, 31(93), 23-38.
Kember, D., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Wong,F. K. (2008). A four-category scheme forcoding and assessing the level of reflectionin written work. Assessment & Evaluationin Higher Education, 33(4), 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293355
Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Kam Yuet Wong, F., Wong, M., Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611442
Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268566
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experimental learning. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.
Labib, W., Pesina, I., Abdelhadi, A., Bayram, G., Nuruunabi, M. (2019). Learning style preferences of architecture and interior design students in Saudi Arabia: A survey. MethodsX, 6, 961-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.04.021
Lang, J. T. (2004). Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design (A. Aeinifar, Trans.). Tehran University Publishing.
Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think. Routledge.
Lawson, B. 91994). Design in mind. Butterworth Architecture.
Lin, X. (2001). Designing metacognitive activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 23-40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30220309
Lindh, I., Thorgren, S. (2016). Critical event recognition: An extended view of reflective learning. Management Learning, 47(5), 525-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507615618600
Pakzad, J. Bozorg, H. (2012). Alefba-e-Mohit Baraye Tarahan. Armanshahr, Tehran.
Soslo, R. (2006). Cognitive psychology. Allyn and Bacon.
Sternberg, R. J. (2016). Styles of thinking and learning. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 13(2), 15-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/082957359801300204
Zolfagharian, M., Aminbeidokhti, A., Jafari, S. (2018). Structural relationship of faculty-student interaction and faculty’s active teaching method with students’ competencies development by mediating the knowledge acquisition. Journal of Research in Educational Science, 12(40), 181-204. https://doi.org/10.22034/jiera.2018.65182
Copyright (c) 2023 IDA: International Design and Art Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IDA: International Design and Art Journal is an open-access academic journal. All publishing rights of the accepted articles are deemed to assign to IDA: International Design and Art Journal. Articles can not be published and copied anywhere, and can not be used without reference.
IDA: International Design and Art Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.