From tools of criticality to mechanisms of control: Instructions in art from the 1960s to the 1990s

Yinzi Yi

Authors

Yinzi Yi Nanyang Technological University https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7974-0200

Keywords:

Instructional texts, Work culture, Socially engaged art, Participatory art

Abstract

This research examines instructional texts in art practices from the 1960s to the 1990s. Instructional texts refer to written words by artists for thought experiments and participatory actions. Scholars have previously examined the interplay between instructions and the specific art forms they generate, revealing the complex relationship between control and freedom, order and disorder, as well as organization and risk. However, these relationships are contextually nuanced. By incorporating the social function of instruction as a critical tool and control mechanism, this research adds complexity to the current scholarship on instruction between participatory agency and authorial control. This research focuses on two historical periods: the 1960s and the 1990s. Whereas the 1960s signaled the transition to a post-industrial society that sought creative labor and adopted a more flattened organizational model, the 1990s witnessed the standardization and globalization of demands for entrepreneurial and artistic labor. To explain the resurgence of instructional texts in the 1990s, this research contextualizes these texts within a broader social framework. It argues that commercial co-optation has transformed these instructions’ critical power against the bureaucratic top-down management model in the industrial era into an apparatus of control over creative laborers cultivated in the post-industrial age.

References

Altshuler, B. (2013). Art by instruction and the pre-history of do it. do it: the compendium. Independent Curators International & Distributed Art Publishers.

Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. Verso.

Anderson, E. (2008). Fluxus in Love. In J. Hendricks, M. Bech, and M. Farzin (Eds.), Fluxus scores and instructions: The transformative years, make a salad. Museum of Contemporary Art.

Bech, M. (2008). Fluxus in love. In J. Hendricks, M. Bech, and M. Farzin (Eds.), Fluxus scores and instructions: The transformative years, make a salad. Museum of Contemporary Art.

Barry, R. (2012). Do something unique that only you and no one else in the world can do. Don’t call it art. In H. U. Obrist (Ed.), do it: the compendium. Independent Curators International & Distributed Art Publishers.

Berlant, L. (2006). Cruel optimism. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 17(3), 20-36.

Bernes, J. (2017). The work of art in the age of deindustrialization. Stanford University Press.

Bishop, C. (2004). Antagonism and relational aesthetics. October, 110, 51-79. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3397557

Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso.

Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Les Presses Du Réel.

Buchloh, B. H. D. (1990). Conceptual art 1962-1969: From the aesthetic of administration to the critique of Institutions. October, 55, 105-143. https://www.jstor.org/stable/778941

Cantor, M. (2004). Untitled. In H. U. Obrist (Ed.), do it: the compendium. Independent Curators International & Distributed Art Publishers.

Conor, B. (2012). Gurus and Oscar Winners: How-to screenwriting manuals in the new cultural economy. Television & New Media, 15(2), 121-138. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1527476412452798

Curators International. (2013). do it (2013-) curated by Hans Ulrich Obrist. Initiatives Exhibitions Learning. https://curatorsintl.org/exhibitions/18072-do-it-2013 (23.07.2023).

Dezeuze, A. (2008). What is a Fluxus score? Some preliminary thoughts. In J. Hendricks, M. Bech, and M. Farzin (Eds.), Fluxus scores and instructions: The transformative years, make a salad. Museum of Contemporary Art.

Dezeuze, A. (2010). An Introduction to the ‘do-it-yourself’ Artwork. In A. Dezeuze (Ed.), The ‘do-it-yourself’ Artwork: Participation from Fluxus to New Media. Manchester University Press.

Dover, C. (2016, February 11). How to work better: Making a Mural on Houston Street. Guggenheim. https://www.guggenheim.org/blogs/checklist/how-to-work-better-making-a-mural-on-houston-street (23.07.2023).

Foster, H. (2003). Arty party. London Review of Books, 25(23), 21-22. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v25/n23/hal-foster/arty-party

Google Arts & Culture. (n.d.). do-it. Google Arts & Culture. https://artsandculture.google.com/project/do-it (26.07.2023).

Hanley, S. K. (2011). The birth of the underground: Fluxus editions. Art21 Magazine. http://magazine.art21.org/2011/10/14/ink-the-birth-of-the-underground-fluxus-editions/#.YZs6b2YzbOQ (10.08.2023).

Hendricks, J. (2008). Fluxus in love. In J. Hendricks, M. Bech, and M. Farzin (Eds.), Fluxus scores and instructions: The transformative years, make a salad. Museum of Contemporary Art.

Kaprow, A. (1977). The use of art performance as a model for personal and social awareness, in Allan Kaprow Papers. Getty Research Library Archives.

Knowles, A. (n.d.). Event scores. Alison Knowles. https://www.aknowles.com/eventscore.html (16.07.2023).

Knowles, A. (2012, March 28). Alison Knowles: Fluxus event scores. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=064qvwX_-kA&t=1s&ab_channel=TheUniversityofChicago (16.07.2023).

Kotz, L. (2007). Words to be looked at. MIT Press.

Kwon, M. (2010). Exchange rate: On obligation and reciprocity in some art of the 1960s and after. In A. Dezeuze (Ed.), The ‘do-it-yourself’ artwork: participation from Fluxus to new media (pp. 229-239). Manchester University Press.

Laemmli, W. E. (2016). The choreography of everday life: Rudolf Laban and the making of modern movement [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania].

Maciunas, G. (1963). Fluxus manifesto, 1963. Museum of Modern Art. https://www.moma.org/collection/works/127947 (10.07.2023).

Matarasso, F. (1997). Use or ornament? The social impact of participation in the arts. Comedia.

McCaw, D. (2011). The Laban sourcebook. Routeledge.

Mills, C. W. (1960). Letter to the new left. New Left Review, 5(23). https://newleftreview.org/issues/i5/articles/c-wright-mills-letter-to-the-new-left (10.08.2023).

Mills, C. W. (1967). In I. L. Horowitz (Ed.), Power, politics, and people: The collected essays of C. Wright Mills. Oxford University Press.

Obrist, H. U. (2013). do it: the compendium. Independent Curators International & Distributed Art Publishers.

Olson, D. R. (1989). On the language and authority of textbooks. In Language, authority and criticism. Falmer Press.

Oren, M. (1993). Anti-art as the end of cultural history. Performing Arts Journal, 15(2), 1-30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3245708

Paul, C. (2019). Histories of the digital now. Whitney Museum of American Art. https://whitney.org/essays/histories-of-the-digital-now (01.08.2023).

Penzin, A. (2010). The soviets of the multitude: On collectivity and collective work: An interview with Paolo Virno. Mediations, 25(1), 81-92. https://mediationsjournal.org/articles/the-soviets-of-the-multitude

Peters, K. (2009, April 28). The aesthetics of notation. signandsight. http://www.signandsight.com/features/1867.html (04.08.2023).

Sawchuk, K. (2001). The cultural apparatus: C. Wright Mills’ unfinished work. The American Sociologist, 32(35), 27-49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27700251

Schiller, H. I. (1989). Culture, Inc.: The corporate takeover of public expression. Oxford University Press.

Schumacher, H. (2018). Inside the world of instruction manuals. Future. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20180403-inside-the-world-of-instruction-manuals (10.08.2023).

Sherer, M. (2016). A network of experience: Community building and social restructuring in Fluxus [Graduate Thesis, Washington University, St. Louis].

Shorey, S. (2020). What you can invent over the weekend’ and the recurring history of corporate DIY. Digital Culture and Society, 6(1), 122-128. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.14361/dcs-2020-0107/html

Siegelaub, S. (2013). A conversation. independent curators international. Galerie. https://galerie.international/conversation-between-seth-siegelaub-and-hans-ulrich-obrist/ (09.08.2023).

Steinmetz, J., Cassils, H., Leary, C. (2006). Behind enemy lines: Toxic titties infiltrate Venessa Beecroft. Signs, 31(3), 753-783. https://www.jstor.org.remotexs.ntu.edu.sg/stable/10.1086/499083

Young, G. (2012). The score: How does the Fluxus perform? A Journal of Performance Art, 34(41), 38-45. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/476773/pdf