Posthuman domestic space as a becoming-machine in performance art
Keywords:
Becoming-machine, Domestic space, Metastability, Posthuman, PerformanceAbstract
Domestic space can be considered a cross-disciplinary subject, not only of art and architecture but also of philosophy, sociology, geography, and anthropology, thanks to the multidirectional correlations. This paper examines domestic space as a cross-disciplinary subject, too, with a qualitative phenomenological research method because this research approaches space as the collection of experiences, like in phenomenology, concerning the perception and the body. Through an interdisciplinary literature review, the notions of domesticity and dwelling are investigated focusing on the notion of experience. Following these notions, the concepts of becoming and machine are explored by Deleuze and Guattari to reach the arguments on co-living that connect to critical posthuman thought. Braidotti’s concept of becoming-machine is interpreted together with Haraway’s and Grosz’s contemporary arguments on becoming and co-living. In this scope, the research has reached the concepts on metastability and performativity in relation to posthuman experiences of co-living. These concepts are associated with the examples from the contemporary performance artworks. The performances of Schweder & Shelley, Gómez-Egaña and McRae are analyzed focusing on the experience that includes the posthuman possibilities for domesticity as a result of this research, aiming to rethink the relations between human and non-human in domestic space.
References
Aureli, P. V., & Tattara, M. (2015). Production/reproduction: Housing beyond the family. Harvard Design Magazine, 41, 96-114.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Clarendon.
Bachelard, G. (1994). The poetics of the space. Beacon.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Wiley.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter. Routledge.
Cieraad, I. (2017). Domestic spaces, In Douglas Richardson (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Geography. John Wiley & Sons.
Colebrook, C. (2002). Understanding Deleuze. Allen & Unwin.
Colomina, B. (2006). Domesticity at war. The MIT Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense. Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus. University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II. Columbia University Press.
Dewsbury D., Thrift N. (2005). “Genesis Eternal”: After Paul Klee. In Ian Buchanan and Gregg Lambert (Eds.), Deleuze and Space. Edinburgh University Press.
Enia, M., Martella, F. (2020). The Domestic City. EAAE-ARCC 2nd Valencia International Biennial of Research of Architecture Conference. València, Spain.
Frearson, A. (2021). Lucy McRae creates a cushion machine to offer lab-grown humans a womb experience. Dezeen. https://www.dezeen.com/2021/05/20/lucy-mcrae-heavy-duty-love-machine-venice-architecture-biennale/?li_source=base&li_medium=bottom_block_1 (08.02.2024).
Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Duke University Press.
Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought. Harper Colophon Books.
Heynen, H. (2005). Modernity and domesticity: Tensions and contradictions. In H. Heynen, & G. Baydar (Eds.), Negotiating domesticity: spatial productions of gender in modern architecture. Routledge.
Hoel, A. S. (2018). Metastability. In R. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman Glossary. Bloomsbury.
Gómez-Egaña, P. (2017). Domain of things. Pedro Gómez-Egaña. https://www.pedrogomezegana.net/domain-of-things (08.02.2024).
Grosz, E. (2001). Architecture from the outside. The MIT Press.
Kline, R. (2017). Alex Scheweder & Warn Shelly your turn. The Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum.
Leach, N. (1997). Rethinking architecture. Routledge
Lorraine, T. (2005). Ahab and becoming-whale: The nomadic subject in smooth space. In Ian Buchanan, and Gregg Lambert (Eds.), Deleuze and Space. Edinburgh University Press.
Larios, P. (2017). 15th Istanbul Biennial Book. Istanbul Foundation for Culture and Arts.
McRae, L. (2021). Heavy duty love for future sensitive humans. Lucy McRae. https://www.lucymcrae.net/cares (08.02.2024).
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1984). The concept of dwelling. Rizzoli.
Sarı, B. (2022). Gender, domesticity and house In Turkey: Context and state of research [Master of Architecture Thesis, Middle East Technical University]. Open METU.
Taylor, D. (2016). Performance. Duke University Press.
Winton, A. G. (2013). Inhabited space: Critical theories and the domestic interior. In L. Weinthal & G. Brooker (Eds.), The handbook of interior architecture and design. Bloomsbury.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 IDA: International Design and Art Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IDA: International Design and Art Journal is an open-access academic journal. All publishing rights of the accepted articles are deemed to assign to IDA: International Design and Art Journal. Articles can not be published and copied anywhere, and can not be used without reference.
IDA: International Design and Art Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.