A study on applications of glocalization in creative industries

Authors

Keywords:

Postmodernism, Creative Industries, Globalization, Glocalization

Abstract

The painful transition process from modernism to postmodernism makes its impact felt in the field of globalization as well. Advances in technology have overcome the difficulties experienced in mass production and accessing global markets, enabling the integration of more local markets into the global economy. However, the rapid increase in participants made it difficult to compete in the global market, and the proliferation of different local markets caused cultural differences to become more evident. The study examines the contribution of creative industries and glocalization strategies to the resolution of the global-local conflict, by considering them together. In this study, the findings were analyzed by using the literature review and the survey method together. A total of 310 people, 145 men and 165 women, participated in the survey in Janury 2019. In the case of Turkey, the research shows that there is a positive correlation between the customer experience created by the global brand by considering the cultural, economic and political data of the local society and the level of ad appreciation.

References

Antmen, A. (2016). 20. Yüzyıl batı sanatında akımlar: Sanatçılardan yazılar ve açıklamalarla. Sel.

Azizağaoğlu, A., & Altunışık, R. (2012). Postmodernizm, sembolik tüketim ve marka. Tüketici ve Tüketim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 33-50.

Classifying and measuring the creative industries: Consultation on proposed changes. (2013). Department for Culture, Media & Sport.

Creative economy report 2010: Creative economy: A feasible development option. (2010). https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditctab20103_en.pdf

Creative industries mapping document. (2001). Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport.

Creative nation: Commonwealth cultural policy, October 1994. (1994). Department of Communications and Arts.

Egilmez, M. (2018). Değişim sürecinde Türkiye: Osmanlı'dan Cumhuriyet'e sosyo-ekonomik bir değerlendirme. Remzi Kitabevi.

Friedman, T. L. (2000). The Lexus and the olive tree. Anchor.

Glocalization. (1991). In the oxford dictionary of new words. Oxford University Press.

Harvey, D. (1997). Postmodernliğin durumu: Kültürel değişimin kökenleri. Metis.

Jameson, F. (1985). Postmodernism and consumer society. In H. Foster (Eds.). Postmodern culture (p. 113-133). Pluto Press.

Levitt, T. (1983, May). The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review, 307-318.

Mccoll, D., & Legorburu, G. (2016). Hikaye tasarımı. MediaCat.

Robertson, P. R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. SAGE.

Schmidt, E. (2014, October 13). The new Gründergeist. Google Europe Blog. https://europe.googleblog.com/2014/10/the-new-grundergeist.html (03.01.2022).

Singh, N. K. (2013). Multilingual trends in a globalized world: Prospects and challenges. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Talu, N. (2010). Modernlik söylemi: Endişeli bakışlarda modern birey. METU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 27(2), 141-171. https://doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2010.2.8

Taylor, F. W. (1997). Bilimsel yönetimin ilkeleri. Çizgi Yayınları.

UNESCO, & UNDP. (2013). Creative economy report 2013: Widening local development pathways.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-01