Time-light-space: Olafur Eliasson’s agency manipulates embodied biological experience of architectural space

Niall O'Hare

Authors

Niall O'Hare Ulster University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-9933

Keywords:

Architecture, Space, Time, Light, Perception

Abstract

The use of artificial brightness as a material form within “Big Bang Fountain” by Olafur Eliasson in 2015, provides insight into how the perception of time articulates subjective meaning and understanding of architectural space. This work outlines the relationship between the human ecological experience of time and the transitory, elemental ambiances of perceptual light cues used by the artist. This fundamental correspondence within Eliasson’s work is founded upon exploring the interstice between perception and experience. This paper argues the interstitial moment of brightness/darkness experienced which tempers the illusionary occurrence of holding time still. The examination of this work seeks to broaden the understanding of how the experience of the phenomenological flux of architectural space subject to light occurs. As such continual incremental changes in perception draw attention to the ecological mechanism which shapes innate the relationship with architectural space. The exploitation of characteristics within perceptual ecology, known to humankind innately, but perhaps not explicitly, informs and elucidates consciousness of the diurnal experience of architectural space. The basis of how and why this work causes a response is a result of the exploitation of evolved phenomenological sensory experience rather than recognition of Euclidian spatial geometries.

References

Bayne, T. (2012). The unity of consciousness. Oxford University Press.

Bergson, H., Birnbaum, D., Eliasson, O. (2002). Olafur Eliasson. Phaidon Press.

Bennet, S., Hayes, S., Uji, M. (2018). Stroboscopic vision when interacting with multiple moving objects: Perturbation is not the same as elimination. Frontiers in Psychology, 25(9), 1-6. https://www.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01290

Brentano, F. (1966). The true and the evident (R. Chisholm, Trans.). Routledge.

Brentano, F. (1995). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. Routledge Classics.

Bullough, J., Marcus, D. (2016). Influence of flicker characteristics on stroboscopic effects. Lighting Research Technology, 48(7), 857-870. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153515599566

Costa-Mattioli, M. (2008). Switching memories on and off. Science, 322(5903), 874-875. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167228

Dawkins, R. (1996). Climbing mount improbable. Viking.

Eliasson, O. (2007). Take your time. M. Grynsztejn (Ed.). San Francisco Museum of Modern Art.

Eliasson, O., Kuo, M. (2018). Experience. Engberg-Pederson, A. (Ed.). Phaidon.

Eliasson, O., Norretranders, T. (2015). Light! On light in life and the life in light. Forlaget Tor.dk.

Foster, R. (2020). Light regulation of circadian rhythms: Fact and fiction and design implications. Architectural Design, 90(6), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2633

Godfrey, M. (2019). Olafur Eliasson: In real life. Tate Publishing.

Husserl, E. (1980). Phenomenology and the foundation of the sciences. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy (Klein, T., Pohl, W., Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff.

Kahn, L. (2013). Silence and light. A. Vassella (Ed.). Park Books.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathworthl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assisting: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of education objectives. Longman.

Lee, C., Joseph, L., Pak, H., Park, S.W & Song, D.W. (2018). Phantom array and stroboscopic effects of a time modulated moving light source during saccadic eye movement. Lighting Research Technology, 50(5), 772-786. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153517693468

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The Primacy of perception. J. Edie (Ed.). Northwestern University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the invisible (A. Lingis, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). The world of perception. Routledge.

Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Routledge.

Perez-Gomez, A. (1983). Architecture and the crisis of modern science. MIT Press.

Perez-Gomez, A. (2020). Mind in life in architecture: A conversation with architectural historian Alberto Perez-Gomez. Architectural Design, 90(6), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2626

Ricoeur, P. (2007). Husserl: An analysis of his phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.

Sartre, J. P. (1995). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). Routledge.

Sellars, P. (2003). Bodies of light. Getty Publications.

Tucker, W. (1975). The condition of sculpture. In M. Ryan. (Ed.). Gravity and grace: The changing condition of sculpture 1965-1975. South Bank Centre Publications.

Turrell, J. (1980). Light and space. Whitney Museum of American Art.

Ursprung, P. (2016). Studio Olafur Eliasson. Taschen.

Veitch, J., Martinsons, C. (2019). Detection of the stroboscopic effect by young adults varying in sensitivity. Lighting Research Technology, 52(6), 790-810. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153519898718

Viola, B. (2003). Passions. Getty Publications.

Wilkins, L., Gray, R. (2015). Effects of stroboscopic visual training on visual attention, motor attention, and catching performance. Perception & Motor Skills, 121(1), 57-79. https://doi.org/10.2466/22.25.PMS.121c11x0

Zeki, S. (2009). In praise of subjective truths. Journal of Physiology, 587(12), 2825-2835. https://doi.org/10.1113%2Fjphysiol.2009.170415