Senses and movement-experience of streets
Anahtar Kelimeler:
Activity- Experience- Movement- Senses- StreetÖzet
Movement-experience is a concept that encompasses the relationship, communication, and interaction between the sense, space, and time. This research aims to examine streets as a medium for experiential movement by analyzing sensory, activity, and physical space variables, conducted with a mixed method that combines quantitative and qualitative approaches. These variables include visual, auditory, and olfactory sensations, user activities like standing, sitting, and walking, and physical features such as pavement width, number of trees, number of barriers, and building height. To collect data, 48 walks were conducted on Mevlana Street at different times and days, resulting 768 time-space sections. The variables were recorded and analyzed using advanced data analysis techniques, and descriptive statistics were generated. The study then explored the relationships between time-activity, time-experience, space-activity, space-experience, and activity-experience using multi-factor variance analysis. Based on the findings, this study proposes innovative design and planning criteria for streets that incorporate a multisensory approach to enhance the experiential quality of urban environments.
Referanslar
Adams, M., Bruce, N., Davies, W., Cain, R., Jennings, P., Carlyle, A., Cusack, P., Hume, K., & Plack, C. (2008). Soundwalking as a methodology for understanding soundscapes. Proc. Institute of Acoustics.
Aiello, L. M., Schifanella, R., Quercia, D., & Aletta, F. (2016). Chatty maps: Constructing sound maps of urban areas from social media data. Royal Society Open Science. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150690
Appleyard, D. (1980). Livable streets: Protected neighborhoods. The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 451(1), 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271628045100111
Biddulph, M., & Council, C. (2012). Radical streets? The impact of innovative street designs on liveability and activity in residential areas. Urban Design International, 17(3), 178-205. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.13
Bosselmann, P., Macdonald, E., & Kronemeyer, T. (1999). Livable streets revisited. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976045
Burton, E., & Mitchel, L. (2006). Inclusive urban design streets for life. Architectural Press.
Cullen, G. (1961). The concise townscape. Architectural Press.
Diaconu, M. (2011). City walks and tactile experience. Contemporary Aesthetics, 9.
Drobnick, J. (2002). Toposmia: Art, scent and interrogations of spatiality. Angelaki - Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 7(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09697250220142047
Dumbaugh, E. (2005). Safe streets, livable streets. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(3), 283-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976699
Ercan, M. A., & Belge, Z. S. (2017). Daha yaşanabilir kentler için mikro ölçek bir yürünebilirlik modeli. Metu Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 34(1), 231-265. https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2016.2.11
Ewing, R., & Clemente, O. (2013). Measuring urban design: Metrics for liveable places. Island Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/13t574809.2015.1008881
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island Press.
Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. (2013). How to study public life. Island Press.
Gifford, R. (1983). The experience of personal space: Perception of interpersonal distance. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 7(3), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986947
Halu, Z. Y. (2010). Kentsel mekân olarak caddeleri̇n mekânsal karakteri̇nin yürünebi̇li̇rli̇k bağlamında i̇rdelenmesi̇; Bağdat Cadddesi̇ örneği̇ [Phd Thesis, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi].
Harvey, C., & Aultman-Hall, L. (2016). Measuring urban streetscapes for livability: A Review of approaches. Professional Geographer, 68(1), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2015.1065546
Hong, J. J. Y., Lee, P. J. P., & Jeon, J. Y. (2010). Evaluation of urban soundscape using soundwalking. 20th International Congress on Acoustics. Sydney, Australia.
Jacobs, A. B. (1993). Great streets. The MIT Press.
Jones, P. B., & Meagher, M. (2015). Architecture and movement: The dynamic experience of buildings and landscapes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Khoshkholghi, S. (2011). Public art: Livable urban public spaces. AESOP PhD Workshop.
Kost, C., & Nohn, M. (2011). Better Streets, Better Cities. ITDP.
Kwan, S. S. (2013). Kinesthetic city. Oxford University Press.
Lefebvre, H. (1974). The production of space. Blackwell.
Lentini, L., & Decortis, F. (2010). Space and places: When interacting with and in physical space becomes a meaningful experience. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14(5), 407-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0267-y
Marshall, S. (2005). Streets and patterns. Taylor and Francis Group.
McLean, K. (2017). Smellmap: Amsterdam-olfactory art and smell visualization. Leonardo. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01225
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996). Göz ve tin. Metis.
Momtaz, R., & Elsemary, Y. (2015). Qualitative conceptions of livability between theory and applications in Egypt. International Conference on IT, Architecture and Mechanical Engineering. (ICITAME 2015). Dubai.
Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418
Moughtin, C. (1992). Urban design street and square. Architectural Press.
National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO). (2011). Urban street Design Guide. In New Forests (Issue December).
Naghizade, M., & Ostadi, M. (2014). The application of tactile experience in urban perception. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 4(1), 53-62.
Nasar, J. L. (1984). Visual preferences in urban street scenes: A cross-cultural comparison between Japan and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(1), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002184015001005
Nasution, A. D., Shalleh, A. G., & Wahid, J. (2014). Livable public open space for citizen’s quality of life in Medan, Indonesia. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 5(2), 131-142.
Noland, R. B., Weiner, M. D., Gao, D., Cook, M. P., & Nelessen, A. (2017). Eye-tracking technology, visual preference surveys, and urban design: Preliminary evidence of an effective methodology. Journal of Urbanism, 10(1), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2016.1187197
Paasch, S. (2015). Livable dimensions of public spaces. Technische Universität Dresden Faculty of Science.
Palipane, K. (2017). Interrogating place: A socio-sensory approach. Cities People Places, 2(1), 55-69.
Pallasmaa, J. (2006). An architecture of the seven senses. In A. P.-G. Steven Holl, Juhani Pallasmaa (Ed.), Questions of Perception, Phenemology of Architecture (pp. 29-37). William Stout Publishers.
Paquette, D., & McCartney, A. (2012). Soundwalking and the bodily exploration of places. Canadian Journal of Communication, 37(1), 135-145.
Perdikogianni, I. (2007). From space to “place”: The role of space and experience in the construction of “place.” 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, İstanbul.
Porteous, J. D. (1996). Environmental aesthetics: Ideas, politics and planning. Routledge.
Quercia, D., Schifanella, R., Aiello, L. M., & McLean, K. (2015). Smelly maps: The digital life of urban smellscapes. ICWSM.
Radicchi, A. (2017). A pocket guide to soundwalking. Some introductory notes on its origin, established methods and four experimental variations. In Perspectives on urban economics: A general merchandise store. Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-5910
Sepe, M. (2010). Liveability, quality and place identity in the contemporary city: How to monitor and mitigate the impact of globalization on urban spaces. Journal of Place Management and Development, 3(3), 221-246. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538331011083952
Sepe, M., & Pitt, M. (2013). Improving liveability and attractiveness by preserving place identity in emblematic thoroughfares: A method and a case study. Urban Design International, 18(3), 229-249. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.3
Simpson, J. (2018). Street DNA: The who, where and what of visual engagement with the urban street. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 13(1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2018.1476032
Staśko, K. (2015). Soundwalk as multifaceted practice argument. Biannual Philosophical Journal, 5(2), 439-455.
Temple, S. (2013). Perceptual experience and its role in architectural design decision making. EAEA-11 Conference, 289-296.
Thwaites, K., Simpson, J., & Simkins, I. (2020). Transitional edges: A conceptual framework for socio-spatial understanding of urban street edges. Urban Design International, 25, 295-309. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00115-9
Tibbalds, F. (1992). Making people friendly towns improving the public environment. Towns and Cities. Spon Press.
Truax, B. (1984). Acoustic communication. Ablex Publishing Corporation
Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Contemporary Sociology, 7(4), 513-514. https://doi.org/10.2307/2064418
Westerkamp, H. (1974). Soundwalking. Sound Heritage
White, E. (1999). Paths, portals, places. In M. Carmona & S. Tiesdell (Eds.), Urban Design Reader. Architectural Press.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2024 IDA: International Design and Art Journal
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıtır.
IDA: International Design and Art Journal açık erişimli akademik bir dergidir. Kabul edilen makalelerin tüm yayın hakları IDA: International Design and Art Journal'a devredilmiş sayılır. Makaleler başka bir yerde yayınlanamaz, kopyalanamaz ve referans göstermeden kullanılamaz.
IDA: International Design and Art Journal Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.
